Hey guys! Straight from the ClevverTV headquarters, I'm Dana Ward. So we're rewinding back to March when beach photos surfaced showing Justin Bieber sporting a tattoo, free for all to see. There wasn't a whole lot of confirmation or denial on whether it was permanent ink, a temporary tat or even a photoshopped image. But now the actual tattoo artist who claims he was the one responsible for the skin art is saying that Justin was a really nice kid, his session went smoothly and the singer didn't cry or anything. The guy went on to say that it seemed that a bunch of other Bieber's family members have the same Jonathan Livingston seagull tattoo - including his dad for parental permission- who also apparently sat in on the inking. So even though J-Biebs has a nice guy image, does knowing he has a body art change your perception of him? And do you think he should have waited until he's 18, a real adult, to get the permanent artwork? Let us know with a quick tweet to @clevvertv. I'm Dana Ward, thanks for tuning in!
