SPFPA Local 506 Members Are Calling For a Criminal Investigation of SPFPA VP Rick O'Quinn after it was discovered his wife Mabel O'Quinn owned two security companies and FAILED to report it as required by law.
NLRB documents ( https://www.nlrb.gov/case/12-RC-009330) lists Rick O’Quinn: Vice President of International Union, Security Police and Fire Professionals of America (SPFPA) address as 3610 Harlock Road Melbourne, FL 32934-8409. This is the same home address listed for Ms. Mabel R. O’Quinn - Rick O’Quinn's wife and the registered agent President and Board member of Patronus Systems Partners, LLC and Patronus Systems, Inc
https://www.govcb.com/government-vendors/profile-SAM00000000001143303-patronus-systems-inc-Melbourne-FL.htm
It should also be noted NLRB documents (https://www.nlrb.gov/case/12-RC-097792 ) lists Rick O’Quinn: Vice President of International Union, Security Police and Fire Professionals of America (SPFPA) office address as 200 4100 N Wickham Rd Ste 102 Melbourne, FL 32935 which is the same addressed used as the Principle office of Patronus Systems, Inc also used by Mabel O'Quinn,
Patronus Systems Inc was also subject of an NLRB Unfair Labor charge brought by the UNITED GOVERNMENT SECURITY OFFICERS OF AMERICA INTERNATIONAL UNION UGSOA a competitor union of SPFPA in Case 09-CA-165689 ( https://www.nlrb.gov/case/09-CA-165689?order=ds_activity&sort=asc ) whereby the UGSOA charge alleged, in pertinent part, that Patronus Systems Inc. (the “Employer”) is a “perfectly clear” successor and violated Section 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act by unilaterally reducing pay rates for unit employees. However, under current Board law, the Employer was not a “perfectly clear” successor because it made clear that it intended to change terms and conditions of employment when it offered jobs to the unit employees. The Employer fully complied with current Board law in fixing initial terms by clearly announcing to employees specific changes in existing terms before or as they were offered employment. Moreover, the Employer thereafter met its obligations as a Burns successor to recognize and bargain with the Union, and the parties have been bargaining and have resolved all of the alleged unilateral changes aside from the allegation still on appeal.
