Ne nje kohe qe procesi per ngjarjet e 21 janarit eshte drejt fundit, prokuroria i kerkon gjykatës te riekspertoje vrasjen e Ziver Veizit, per te cilen akuzohet ish-gardisti Agim Llupo.
Kerkesa u be ne seancen e radhës nga prokuroi Blerim Tominaj, i cili i cilesoi te pabesueshme dhe jo profesionale konkluzionet e ekspertit Ndoc Çardaku, sipas te cilit vrasja mund te kete ardhur nga nje plumb rikoshet dhe kjo pasi ne teshat e viktimës jane gjetur dy copëza te drunjta. Prokurori u shpreh se per shkak te dyshimeve prokuroria nuk e ka vlerësuar qe ne fillim ekspertizën e tij dhe kjo ka qene arsyeja qe nuk e kane përfshirë as ne dosjen e dërguar ne gjykate. Por kërkesa e prokurorit është kundërshtuar nga mbrojtësit e tre te pandehurve. Ata pretenduan se eksperti Çardaku ka njohuritë e nevojshme dhe se ekspertiza e tij eshte mjafte e qarte. Pasi u tërhoq per vendim trupi gjykues vendosi te pranoje kërkesën e akuzes duke kërkuar nga palët te paraqesin ne seancën e radhes nga dy emra ekspertesh, nga te cilet gjykata do te zgjedhe njerin per te kryer ekspertimin.
At a time to process the events of January 21 is towards the end, the prosecutor asks the court to riekspertoje killing Ziver Veizi, for which the accused former gardisti Sunrise Llupo.
The request was made in the next session by the prosecutor Blerim Tominaj, which is considered unreliable and unprofessional expert conclusions Ndoc Çardaku, under which murder may have come from a ricochet bullet and that after the victim's clothes were found two pieces timber. The prosecutor said that due to the prosecution allegations has estimated that at the beginning of his expertise and this was the reason that have not included even in the file sent to the court. But the prosecutor's request was rejected by the advocates of the three defendants. They claimed that expert has Çardaku knowledge needed and that his expertise is quite clear. After being away for decision the panel decided to accept the request of the prosecution asking the parties to submit to the next session of the two names of experts, from which the court will choose one to perform expertise.
